|
BLOODSTALKERS (1983)
TOM’S REVIEW (cont'd):
Sadly, whether arguing about the amount of household dust that could possibly
accumulate during an undisturbed eight-year stretch, reminiscing about
Mike’s accidental-murdering-of-innocent-children-during-the-Vietnam-War
days, or detailing Danny’s “fatal fascination for stairways,”
these guys do nothing but provide evidence supporting my theories of cinematic
Darwinism. (See my essay near the end of this book for an in-depth discussion
of this groundbreaking theory.)
One conversation in particular exemplifies the inanity that dominates
the Bloodstalker dialogue. With the crew ranged around a stiff wooden
table recounting the good old days, Danny starts up a tactless discussion
of Mike’s troubled stint as a Marine. Glancing longingly across
the table at his friend, Danny begins:
Hey Mike, there’s something I’ve always wanted to ask you.
You know we’ve been friends since high school, you were so hot on
the military; I was wondering why you got out? I know you were, what,
halfway to retirement?
Mike answers:
You know Dan, I really don’t have an answer for you. Remember how
I could hardly wait to join the Marines? Protect the faith. Be a man.
Wow. I still believe that.
What? Does this answer mean anything? Are we to think that Mike wishes
he didn’t quit the Marines? Or that he’s glad he did? And
does it matter either way? The fact that Danny later highlights in graphic
detail exactly why Mike did quit (the aforementioned murdering innocent
children thing) renders the conversation above irrelevant and just plain
cruel. I suppose a tenuous argument can be made that such talk serves
to develop character, but to my mind, it’s just filler material,
eating up time until the Bloodstalkers can get their act in gear.
Finally, after a skinny dipping adventure that was thankfully aborted,
and a grandiose soliloquy on the glories of friendship, we get a taste
of what it means to be a Bloodstalker, as someone, or something, crashes
through the vacation home window, snatches at Jeri, and puts a good scare
into the gang. Although no one is hurt during the incident, the scene
nevertheless serves as an effective jump-start to the plot, yanking us
out of our boring-conversation stupor, and reminding us that we are watching
a horror movie after all. Determined not to let anything ruin his vacation,
Mike ignores his compatriots’ pleas to abandon the trip and dashes
across the darkened Florida countryside in search of help, barricading
the women folk inside the cabin, and entrusting the spineless Danny with
their protection.
What follows is one of the most inexplicable and wonderful scenes I’ve
yet to come across in all my days of watching horror. Spotting a lighted
church pulsing with the strains of a gospel choir at work, Mike races
to the spot. Near the entrance, he meets with the director of the choir
and begs the man for help. Despite employing wild, flailing gestures in
the pleading of his case, Mike fails to move the stolid churchgoer, and
is forced to continue his search for assistance. What makes the scene
endure in my memory, and endows it with historical genre significance,
is that Mike’s conversation with the director is entirely inaudible.
Yes, we see Mike’s lips moving, the camera inching close enough
to the conversation that a practiced lip reader might decipher the enigmatic
dialogue. But of actual spoken words, Mike is mute.
Whether this astonishingly amateurish scenario was an attempt at some
ill-conceived cinematic artistry, or whether it was due to a mangled audio
track, I cannot say, but we at ShockMarathons wholeheartedly endorse such
ill-advised inclusions and applaud whoever is responsible.
Page 3...
|